My final act as a Jehovah's Witness was to attend my judicial committee, or apostasy trial
My final act as a Jehovah’s Witness was to attend my judicial committee, or apostasy trial

I received the phone call on Friday night. I was expecting it. My mother-in-law had been approached at the kingdom hall by my “coordinator” (chairman of the local elders), who told her he would be phoning me.

She could tell from his sullen demeanor that it wouldn’t be to talk about the weather. The elders wanted to meet with me.

And so I had plenty of time to brace myself for the inevitable. I knew this was likely to be about my website.

Though I’ve been running JWsurvey for more than two years, it has only been within the past two months that I have shown my face and stepped out, as it were. I knew it was only a matter of time before confrontation with the local elders would ensue.

I will refer to my coordinator as Bob.*

Bob is a likeable guy who has risen through the ranks rapidly since his baptism. When I first met him in 2006 on my first trip to Croatia he had only been baptized a couple of years before. Now he was my local coordinator, which (with all due respect to Bob) epitomizes the shortage of male Witnesses eligible to assume oversight in Croatia. Bob would probably still be handling the microphones by now if he were a Witness in Britain or the States, no matter how capable he may be.

What Bob lacks in charisma and experience he makes up for in kindness and positivity – always wearing a smile on his face. This time, however, I could tell he wasn’t smiling.

“We know about your website,” Bob said in a melancholy voice, after an awkward introduction partly in Croatian, partly in his broken English. At that point, I knew this was finally it. I had been discovered.

“I see,” I replied.

“Could you come to meet with us at the kingdom hall on Sunday night, six o’clock?” he asked.

“Yes,” I said. “But on one condition…”

I explained to Bob that I seriously disliked two of our elders, and I didn’t want either of them involved in my judicial committee. One elder, Tom, had pulled my wife into the backroom at a meeting without me being present, and interrogated her about me and our private life. The other, Dean, had used information he gleaned from inviting us round for dinner to theorize, entirely mistakenly, about our motives for becoming inactive.

I wanted neither of these men involved in the final act of my 23 years as a Witness. And this still left at least two elders for Bob to choose from to make up the three needed for a judicial committee.

Bob agreed to my condition regarding Dean and Tom. He also agreed that, because I am English with a weak command of Croatian, the meeting would be held in English to the extent possible. It was for this reason, apparently, that an elder from the Branch Office in Zagreb would be attending. I later learned that the branch representative was also invited at least partly due to the fact that Sisak elders had no experience in dealing with apostasy, so they needed some guidance from higher up the chain.

When Sunday evening finally rolled round, I felt reasonably in control. I knew this was basically a formality. Some of my Ex-JW friends were suggesting I take along a lawyer, but I couldn’t imagine how this would be necessary. After all, both parties wanted the same thing – a parting of the ways between me and the organization.

Others suggested I record the meeting for uploading to YouTube as others had done. My wife and I discussed this and both reached the same conclusion. Not only would it be unkind to Bob and the other elders to push them into the limelight without their permission, it would also potentially compromise my integrity.

I would almost certainly be asked not to record the meeting, or whether I was carrying any recording equipment. I wanted to go into the meeting confident, with nothing to hide. I also wasn’t comfortable with lying on tape as to whether I was recording or not. Not recording the meeting and simply writing about it seemed the best course of action to take.

In the hours leading up to my judicial I was bombarded with messages of support and solidarity from others who had been through the same thing. Emails, Facebook messages and tweets came flooding in, giving me great confidence. One tweet, which I found particularly heartwarming, simply said…

 

Misha was right, I HAD already won. These guys had no power over me. They were simply oblivious spectators in my ongoing struggle with a cruel authoritarian cult that threatens my family. In fact, were it not for my desire to protect my family, I wouldn’t be going at all. I needed to let the organization know what would happen if my local elders made things worse for me than they needed to.

A last-minute email

Moments before I was due to get in the car I received an email. It was from Dad. I had emailed him two days ago to tell him about my judicial committee, inviting him to call me but only if it wasn’t too much for him to handle. His reply read as follows…

You’re right, it is too much, heartbreaking I think for us both. The happiest and most rewarding times of my life as well as the darkest convince me of my beliefs. I am so sad that that has not been you experience. The hardest thing for a parent is to let go when you feel they are making a bad choice. It’s yours to take and I must respect that.

We both must stand the consequences of our determination. You soon will become a parent yourself you will do your best I am sure to give her what you believe to be the best, that’s all your mum and I wanted for you.

I will never give up my hope for you despite your making it clear that if you are put outside you will never return.

I do not know how I will bear it if you reject the way I have chosen to walk, but despite how you feel about my sincerity I cannot put into words the love I feel for you, [your wife], and my prospective grandchild.

Love Dad

I was stunned. My mind had already been grappling with my impending face-off with the organization, and now I had Dad’s email to think about. He had wrongly assumed that I doubted his sincerity.

I knew why he had said this. I also knew that in my reply I would need to put his mind at ease, at least on that score. I don’t question my Dad’s sincerity at all – merely his unbending allegiance to a corrupt organization and refusal to look at the other side of the argument considering what is at stake.

Dad had also pointed out a fundamental difference between us. For him, the times of happiness and sadness in life are the driving force behind his beliefs. For me, periods of good and bad fortune and emotional responses to the same mean nothing when it comes to affirming religious convictions. There is no room for such sentimentality, especially if family ties are in the balance. What is of overriding importance to me is what is true, and what isn’t.

Sadly, Dad cannot see things that way. He cannot see that, in putting trust in an organization that makes him feel good, he is doing nothing different from the billions of followers of other religions across the globe.

It was this contradiction that was highlighted in our last face-to-face encounter. I had been left speechless and sobbing by his seeming indifference to the fact that his logic could lead him to be a follower of ANY religion.

When he came to console me, I shrugged him away. “Don’t you dare pretend to love me!” I yelled in the heat of the moment. That confrontation had clearly left both of us bruised.

Now he was letting me know that “we both must stand the consequences of our determination” – his way of saying, “I will shun you because you no longer share my beliefs, because that’s what my religion tells me to do and I must be obedient.”

It wasn’t unexpected, but it rattled me all the same. I tried to put it to the back of my mind. If anything, this was further proof that I was doing the right thing. No son should ever have to receive that sort of email from his father. My progeny would certainly not see me abandon my relationship with them for ANY reason, let alone personal beliefs. The line would need to be drawn, and it would be drawn tonight.

The trial begins

I parked round the corner from the kingdom hall by the River Kupa, which flows through Sisak, my home town. After filming a quick video in my car, I walked the short distance through the rain to the kingdom hall. The gates to the car park were open. The lights were on, and there were two cars in the car park.

I stepped inside and was greeted by Bob. I entered the auditorium and two other elders greeted me in perfect English, neither of whom I recognized.

One, named Davor, was from the Croatian branch office. He must have been in his forties, schoolteacher-like in appearance. The other elder from Zagreb (about my age or perhaps younger) was called Dean. He seemed jolly and likeable. Bob joked that this was not the same Dean I had specified, so he assumed it was okay to invite him. I said that was fine by me.

We sat down facing each other over a small table that seemed to serve mostly as Davor’s desk. It quickly became obvious that Davor would be chairing the meeting.

I was asked whether it would be okay to conduct at least part of the meeting in Croatian. I said this might be a problem since my Croatian is extremely poor, so if the meeting is to benefit me I would appreciate if they could use English as much as possible, but I wouldn’t mind if I heard the occasional Croatian. They were fine with this.

They asked if it was okay for them to open in prayer, to which I said “yes.” All bowed their heads and Bob said a prayer in Croatian, none of which I could follow – not that I was really trying. I had too much on my mind. I went along with the prayer and said a loud “amen” at the end, just to put their minds at ease more than anything.

I was told that this was a judicial committee, formed on the basis that I was accused of apostasy. Did I understand this? “Yes,” I said.

For the sake of my own privacy, this meeting would not be recorded, and it would be appreciated if I did not record the meeting. I found this logic strange, since I had no concerns over privacy and would have been only too happy for it to be recorded, but this was clearly the Watchtower way of saying “we don’t want you to record this meeting.”

I assured them I wasn’t recording it, and that it was important to me that they understood that I wasn’t recording it. This seemed to put them at ease.

Davor explained that the purpose of the meeting was two-fold. They wished to “offer help” to me spiritually. I found this amusing, not least because it was later explained that doctrine was NOT to be discussed. How could they help me spiritually without discussing doctrine, since the reason I was there was due to my disagreement WITH doctrine? This alone highlighted, for me, how pointless the meeting was.

!cid_DF81B1D9-F625-4EFB-8757-A19D1EED9B7EDavor then made a throwaway remark to the effect that I was free to leave any religion if I so wished.

I had to interject.

“Respectfully, no – I am NOT free to leave this religion. I won’t have any of you tell me that. If I wasn’t being faced with repercussions for leaving, THEN you could say that I am free to leave. But I’ve had an email only this evening from my father telling me that he will shun me once I’ve left. My family is being used by Watchtower as a weapon against me. So you can say whatever you like, but I won’t have it said that I am free to leave this religion. Is that absolutely clear?”

There was awkward silence, begrudging acknowledgment, and the meeting continued.

The second purpose of the meeting, it was explained, was to protect the congregation. Two scriptures in the book of Galatians were read out, as follows…

“Brothers, even if a man takes a false step before he is aware of it, you who have spiritual qualifications try to readjust such a man in a spirit of mildness.” – Galatians 6:1, New World Translation (2013 revision)

“A little leaven ferments the whole batch of dough.” – Galatians 5:9, New World Translation (2013 revision)

The latter scripture made me chuckle to myself. Were they aware that they were insulting me by referring to me as leaven that could corrupt others? Apparently not. I was to take it as a given that I was no better than a lump of yeast in their eyes. And again, how were they hoping to “readjust” me with a “spirit of mildness” while refusing to discuss my issues with the organization? It was plain crazy.

With the scriptural pretext to the meeting out of the way, conversation turned to my apostasy. Davor explained that they had found out about my website. A stapled print-out of one of the articles was produced and placed on Davor’s table, facing him. I was asked if these were my words. I strained from my position to see which article it was, being as it was facing away from me. Davor noticed that I couldn’t see and turned the print-out so I could see it. I saw that it was my “coming out” article – The Story of Cedars – A Prisoner No More. I could see that certain sentences had been highlighted in pink.

I was asked, “did you write these words, and do you stand by them?”

“Absolutely,” I responded. “I would also add that there is a promise on my website that if there is anything wrong, or incorrect, or misleading, I will change or remove it if it is brought to my attention. I have never had a serious email asking me to make changes in reference to this promise – only the occasional angry email from a Witness who stumbles on my site and complains about some point or other because they don’t know as much about the organization as I do.”

Again, my words received begrudging acknowledgment. Davor continued.

“Do you still consider yourself as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses?”

“No, I do not.” I replied.

Davor then brought up that I had mentioned in my article about my wife and I preparing letters of disassociation. I was asked if I had brought these letters with me. I said that yes, I had.

“In that case, the matter is settled,” said Davor. “You are no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Do you have anything to add?”

I replied that yes, I did have a few things to say. First, I would appreciate being told how they came to learn about the website.

Davor looked at Bob, and Bob said that it was a sister in Croatia who had found the website and emailed him about it. Apparently this sister was not in our congregation.

I was slightly disappointed. I had hoped for a more romantic story involving frenzied phone calls from Brooklyn etc., but it seemed it was a simple case of a local snitch. Apparently the circumstances surrounding this woman’s discovery of my website, and precisely what she had been doing on it, were of no pressing concern. She had reported to her superiors like a good loyal Witness, and that was good enough for them.

Threatening my aggressors

I then explained that my main reason for being there was my family. My parents in-law, who live under the same roof, are both heavily reliant on my wife and I for a number of reasons. We had reached an agreement with them that religious matters, and particularly our objections to Watchtower, were not open for discussion in our household.

Like my Dad, my wife’s parents simply refuse to look at evidence. Not discussing our issues, and not making any attempts to awaken them, was the easiest and least distressing solution for all concerned.

I was also mindful of the need on my part not to pursue other members of the congregation, or Witnesses elsewhere in Croatia, for the purpose of enlightening them. This too would distress my parents in-law, and put strain on a relationship on which we are mutually dependent.

As I explained to Davor, my wife and I are happy with the status quo. I am happy with my work on the internet being limited to English-speaking countries and not to the country I live in if this is the price I must pay for caring for my family.

If, however, my parents in-law were to be coerced into not speaking to us, things could change very quickly. I would no longer have any reason NOT to turn my attentions to Croatia, with its modest 5,000-or-so publishers. Newspapers would be contacted. Television and radio appearances would be made. Websites would be set up, leaflets would be distributed, and respectful demonstrations outside conventions could be expected.

The choice was therefore theirs. They could let me leave and allow my parents-in-law to deal with the situation in their own way without coercion, or they could make things harder for us and thus remove any reason I have not to create havoc for the organization in Croatia.

The elders looked at each other.

“We can only tell your parents-in-law, if they approach us, what it instructs them to do in the Bible,” said Davor. The others nodded.

I could feel myself losing my calm. They hadn’t grasped my threat.

“So you’re saying that you will tell my parents to shun us, even though this will create problems for them and for you?”

“We can only tell them what it says in the Bible. The Bible is our only authority.” An air of confidence swept across Davor’s face. My frustration mounted.

Fortunately, as the mood of the meeting darkened, I managed to gather my thoughts and find the route around what they were saying. This was one of two occasions during the meeting when my feelings got the better of me and I struggled but somehow managed to regain composure.

“Ah, if you’re saying that you will tell them to do what it says in the Bible that is fine by me,” I said, “because nowhere in the Bible does it say family members should shun each other. In fact, it says the opposite.”

There was a nervous silence.

“In the parable of the prodigal son, which I’m sure you’re all familiar with, the son only returns to his father for… I forget the exact phrase… insincere reasons. He did not show true repentance according to the organization’s rules by rejecting his course of conduct.” (Luke 15:17-20)

The parable of the prodigal son contradicts Watchtower's shunning practice
The parable of the prodigal son contradicts Watchtower’s shunning practice

I struggled to remember the organizational phrase “worldly sadness,” which is the term used for when someone only returns to the congregation for improper motives rather than a sincere determination to cease wrongdoing, but it escaped me in the moment.

“The son goes away and has sex with prostitutes. He lives a life of sin and debauchery. And what is the only reason that he decides to return to his father?”

I paused, waiting for Davor or one of the other elders to answer. There was silence.

“We know the answer to your question,” he said coolly.

“Great, if you know the answer to my question, then what is it?” I asked.

“We don’t need to answer your question,” Davor replied sternly.

“What do you mean you don’t need to answer my question? It’s a simple answer, what is it?”

“None of us need to answer your scriptural question. We know what it is. We don’t need to answer any scriptural questions,” Davor asserted. His eyes seemed vacant. It was as though the friendly schoolteacher had evaporated, replaced by a cold Watchtower interface.

“That’s very interesting. Very interesting indeed,” I said. “I have asked you a simple scriptural question, in much the same way as Jesus would have asked the Pharisees a scriptural question, and you have refused to answer it. That tells me a lot.”

I lingered for just a moment to allow the awkward silence to drive home my point.

“The reason why the prodigal son returned to his father is…” I paused, and placed my hands on my stomach, “because he was hungry. He only came back to his father because he was hungry, not because of any real repentance. And how did his father respond?” I gestured with my arms, spreading them as if to receive the son in a warm embrace.

My point was made. The family bond surpasses everything, including perceived wrongdoing. The elders looked at each other and offered no reply.

“There is just something I’m not sure about,” Dean interjected. The other two elders looked at him. Dean had been mostly silent throughout, following what I was saying intently. I was beginning to warm to him, and was intrigued as to what he would say.

“You seem like a really nice man,” he said. “What I don’t understand is why would a nice man like you threaten us? It doesn’t make sense to me. It’s like…” Dean struggled to find the proper word to complete his question in English. A brief discussion ensued in Croatian as the other two tried to help him. I waited for them to quieten down before answering.

“That’s a very good question Dean. All I would say is this. You can take a lot of things from a man. You can take his house. You can take his money. You can take his car. You can take his pet. All of these things a man can cope with losing. But if you take a man’s family away from him, you will find he is capable of doing a lot of things. And building a website is the least of the things you need to worry about. You have to understand, from MY perspective Watchtower is the aggressor here. I am the one being threatened, and I am only telling you all that will happen if you remove my reasons for not doing anything.”

Dean seemed bewildered. Perhaps he was feigning disapproval in front of the others, or maybe what I said was lost in translation. All the same, when I look back I don’t think I could have explained myself better. Watchtower were the bullies in this scenario, not me.

A letter not accepted

“Right,” said Davor, “well I think that brings things to a conclusion. I just need to see the letters of disassociation.”

“Of course,” I said, reaching for my folder and handing over a piece of paper containing handwritten, signed statements from both my wife and I. The end was in sight.

Davor placed the paper in front of him and began reading it aloud, beginning with my wife’s message in Croatian. My wife had written it rather hurriedly as I had been making my way out the door. She had offered to read it to me, but I told her she could tell me what it said when I got back. I was therefore in the dark as to what the letter said.

Davor finished reading the letter and muttered something in Croatian to the other two, who nodded. He then read my letter aloud, which simply read as follows…

To whom it may concern,

From henceforth, let it be known that I, [my real name], am no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses – nor do I have or seek any affiliation with the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.

Yours sincerely, [signed].

I confess, I enjoyed hearing them read this out loud! But there was a setback in store.

“We can accept your letter,” said Davor. “It’s very clear and unequivocal. However, we cannot accept your wife’s letter. She doesn’t quite make it clear enough that she no longer wants to be a Witness.”

I couldn’t believe it. All sorts of thoughts began flying through my head. Up until now the meeting had gone almost entirely according to plan. Now it seemed my wife hadn’t been clear enough in her letter? I couldn’t imagine how that could be.

“Why, what does she say?” I asked.

“It says that she no longer feels like she is a Witness. It isn’t clear enough.” said Davor.

This actually made sense. My wife is the ultimate peacemaker and hates upsetting or offending people. It wouldn’t surprise me if, in her efforts to be diplomatic, she had failed to be quite as forceful in her statement as a judicial committee requires.

“No problem,” I said. “I don’t have credit on my phone but I see you have a phone there. Do you mind if I use it to call my wife and have her speak to you? I’m sure we can sort this out.”

“No, that won’t be necessary,” said Davor.

“Please, it won’t take a moment.”

“No,” said Davor, “that wouldn’t be appropriate.”

“Listen, one way or another this ends tonight,” I said, growing in frustration. “Do you want me to go and drive her here through the pouring rain so she can tell you how she feels herself?”

“No, it would be too stressful for her,” said Davor, “we will arrange a separate meeting just for her.”

“Look, there’s absolutely no way my wife will meet with you,” I said. “Bob can tell you what she was like when he called me the other day to arrange this meeting. She refused to even come to the phone to translate for him. She just can’t handle anything like that.”

Bob nodded in agreement.

“You must understand,” said Davor, “we are meeting to discuss you, not your wife. We will need to arrange to meet with her separately so that we can find out how she feels and offer spiritual help.”

I could feel my anger swelling. My protective instincts began to kick in.

“Are you seriously telling me that you can’t accept her letter, even though she says she no longer feels like a Jehovah’s Witness?” I said.

Davor nodded.

“So let me get this straight. You’re saying that even if my wife had written exactly the same words that I had written, you wouldn’t have accepted it because this meeting is about me and not her?”

“Yes, that’s correct.” said Davor.

“So why did you even read her letter if this meeting is only about me?” I asked.

“She wrote us a letter, and we wanted to see what she said!” he replied smugly.

“I feel as though you’ve tricked me. Right at the beginning you asked if we BOTH had letters. You made it sound as though you were ready to receive statements of disassociation from both of us.”

“John, you know how this works,” said Davor. “You’ve been an elder. You know we need to follow procedures handed to us, and the procedures clearly state that we need to meet with your wife separately.”

At that moment, as had happened over the shunning issue, the fog in my mind suddenly lifted. From somewhere I regained my “elder head” and was able to find another way around the problem.

“Okay this is very simple,” I said. “All my wife needs to do is write the same letter that I have written and make sure Bob gets it, and then you will have to accept it as her letter of disassociation.”

Davor’s smug demeanor vanished. I had rumbled him.

“Er, we would not want to encourage you or your wife to do that,” he spluttered.

“No problem,” I said, calmness restored. “That’s precisely what we’ll do. I’ll tell my wife to send Bob a letter as soon as possible. Not that I want you thinking I’m telling her what to do – this is her decision.”

And with that, the meeting was concluded. There was no final prayer. All four of us rose from our seats.

“Can I shake your hands?” I asked Davor.

“Yes,” he said.

I shook the hands of all three enthusiastically, lingering a moment with Dean as he stifled an unexpected sneeze.

I thanked all three and headed for the exit. Bob watched to see me leave before returning to be with the others as I walked out the door.

The rain had stopped falling. I was finally free.

 

new-cedars-signature2

 

 

 

 

 

 

All conversations in the above article have been paraphrased to the best of my recollection. It should not be assumed that I have rendered a verbatim account of everything said, or the exact order.

Special thanks to Vincent Deporter for contributing artwork to this article.

* Out of respect for their privacy, I have slightly altered the names of the elders involved apart from Davor, who I refer to by first name only.

# I have since learned from my wife that a more accurate translation of the relevant part of her letter was: “I do not consider myself as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses.” She has today sent an email to Bob telling him that she wants to be announced as disassociated on the same night as me, and doesn’t wish to be pursued on the matter.

Further reading…

Article translations: Polish | …

Related video…

132 thoughts on “My 21st Century Apostasy Trial

  • December 31, 2013 at 4:25 pm
    Permalink

    Happy New Year for all of you!
    May our dream come true: the end of all cruel and inhumane actions of cults like JW’s. And … Let’s keep on living our dream!

  • December 31, 2013 at 4:50 pm
    Permalink

    Bravo our brother! Welcome to your freedom. We re sorry you’re losing your family to this wicked cult. At least your child will be born in freedom and not have the scars and emotional baggage that our daughter Shyla has.

  • December 31, 2013 at 4:51 pm
    Permalink

    These arrogant hypocrites. Why don’t they talk about their “little leaven” of pedophilia, domestic violence, flip-flopping on doctrine, false prophecy and predictions about Armageddon, calling rape fornication if a woman doesn’t “fight” when the bible only mentions screaming not fighting, strong-arming children into baptism and then shunning them later in life, changing the bible to suit their own needs, not allowing masturbation or oral sex when these aren’t mentioned or even hinted at in the bible, not mentioning children once in their literature when it comes to being in violent and abusive homes… Click my user name for more. My fingers hurt from typing about all their fails.

  • December 31, 2013 at 5:15 pm
    Permalink

    I’m happy for you, John! Best wishes!

  • December 31, 2013 at 6:10 pm
    Permalink

    Great job, John, in standing up to those bullies, puppets of the Society. Their stone hearts attest to the evilness of the organization. If you were a pedophile, they would have counseled you with the scriptures and welcomed you into their fold while threatening the victim and family. Thanks for your hard work and effort with your website which is helping so many of us. I’m so glad that your wife is 100% supportive and is not blind. Wish you the best! BTW, I love the cartoon!

  • December 31, 2013 at 6:39 pm
    Permalink

    All the best to you and your family John! I’m sure they went through your website with a fine tooth comb! There was no “helping” you, just making it official. So now you can get back to writing and start the New Year off right! My advice,as painful as it is don’t contact or update your parents on anything right now,let them miss you. If you contact them and be the good son, you will not let them know how it feels to be cut off. Let your dad wonder about YOU for a little while.He may call just to ask you why haven’t you called .I really hope that he comes around! Love to you and your wife!

  • December 31, 2013 at 6:57 pm
    Permalink

    congratulations you have just re-claimed your life. As far as those talk in circle boys, the same as going to a court for a motor vehicle ticket-kangaroo court and worse, may they come away thinking about what you said. As far as your Dad, I found it interesting when he said ” we both must stand the consequences of our determination” – Well one day just like my Dad he may realize what he was losing. Time and circumstances makes a man think many things.
    Great Job moving forward, enjoy that new found peaceful feeling that will come to you day by day. You did the right thing and now your free!!

  • December 31, 2013 at 7:24 pm
    Permalink

    So they said “it would be appreciated if [you] did not record the meeting”? The oh-so-secret elder’s handbook “Shepherd the Flock of God”, page 90, discusses “Judicial Hearing Procedure” and says loud and clear: “Recording devices should not be allowed.” In fact, the entire sentence is in BOLD. Really important, it would seem.

    Well, happy 2014. Now we can celebrate a full century of … whatever.

  • December 31, 2013 at 9:13 pm
    Permalink

    Hey John, thanks for sharing your experience. A bitter/sweet story to say the least.

    Re-examining my situation currently (from all angles).

    I admire your honesty and courage.

    Wish both you and your family the best.

  • December 31, 2013 at 9:28 pm
    Permalink

    Bravo my friend. You are now on the other side (and have left the dark side)… Congratulations!
    Your example is encouraging to us all!

  • December 31, 2013 at 10:01 pm
    Permalink

    “Free at last, Free at last, thank God Almighty you are free at last.”-Dr. Martin Luther King Jr
    My life and time is too precious to sit in a meeting with those baby killers (blood issue) and protectors of pedophiles. I just walked away and DF them. Lost a son and about 50 relatives but so goes the cost of freedom.
    You and your wife enjoy your baby and you are good parents to not let her be born in slavery to a hostile organization that might require you to sacrifice her one day. Peace and love Jacqueline from FOJW site.

  • December 31, 2013 at 10:35 pm
    Permalink

    Excellent job protecting your wife from that kangaroo court!

  • December 31, 2013 at 11:35 pm
    Permalink

    It is done.

    Don’t be surprised by the grief you and your wife may feel at some point. After all, it is as though you are dead to them now. Although you are not shunning them, your family is shunning you. There is a loss for them and for you. They will miss you much more than you will miss them. All they have is the (b)organization. You have your freedom and your life to live as you choose, without guilt or hypocracy. And your precious baby on the way!!! A baby who will grow up without your parents love and affection. I’m sure you and your wife will more than make up for that with lots of unconditional love.

    Just a random thought, I wonder if anyone has ever tried to sue the b(org) for alienation of affection? Not only are they punishing you, they will be punishing their grandchild, who is innocent and has done nothing wrong.

    Happy new year to you my friend!!! I wish you love and happiness.

  • January 1, 2014 at 1:25 am
    Permalink

    I appreciate anyone who stands up for what he truly believes, and lives according to that belief regardless of any opposition. However, my concern here is for your wife, and they way they want to play the two of you against one another. As her husband, you have every right to be there at her hearing, and if so desired she has every right not to attend one at all. A letter of disassociation is all that is needed. If they want in-person confirmation of the letter, invite them over to your house; there is no reason to go back to their house….

  • January 1, 2014 at 5:03 am
    Permalink

    You have certainly got the balls to do something that I wouldn’t (well for the mean time anyway). One thing I have trouble understanding is, what was that sister looking at apostate material in the first place. Shouldn’t there be a JC for her for conspiring against the Org. Who knows what wicked lies of satan she could concealing in her heart. Considering that you have not used your real name, she can’t of just stumbled on you web site, she must of deliberately sort it out. It’s a real shame they didn’t answer, but a question and I have wondered about that in apostate cases. BTW John I was just wondering if you could adjust my name from “thinking of leaving” to “I have left”. As I would like to unofficially announce that “I am no longer one of Jehovah’s witnesses”. Hehe. It’s been 8 months now since I walked out the door.

  • January 1, 2014 at 6:09 am
    Permalink

    Cedars, I came across your YT video on this matter recently and it really broke my heart. I’m truly sorry for what you’re going through and I’m sorry for your father too.

    I don’t know how you feel about it but I feel unable to be angry to an “average JW”. Questioning one’s religion is a very difficult thing to do and many people lack the necessary education and emotional disposition to do this. I of course don’t know how it stands with your family in general, but despite what it results I cannot help but feeling sorry for many JW’s, rather than feeling angry for them. I have these thoughts for people in other religions too – it’s not easy to “disconnect” from long-learned beliefs. It requires a lot of education, time, courage in so many ways that I think not everyone have this possibility.

    What I really can’t figure out is the concept of a Judicial Committee … Can you stop for a moment and realize how ridiculous this is ?

    There is one phrase you wrote I would like to stress upon :

    “What is of overriding importance to me is what is true, and what isn’t.”

    If you’re striving honestly for this goal, no judicial committee on earth is qualified to judge you.

  • January 1, 2014 at 6:40 am
    Permalink

    “Estou feliz com o meu trabalho na internet que está sendo limitado a países de língua Inglês e não para o país que eu vivo em se este é o preço que tenho de pagar para cuidar de minha família.”

    Quero que o irmão saiba que nós, aqui no Brasil, somos muito solidários com o sofrimento que o irmão está passando neste exato momento. É um triunfo também o que o irmão está vivendo, pois humilhou os que o queriam humilhar. Que Jeová, aquele que não desassocia pessoas que tenham ‘mentalidade mais nobre’ possa amparar ao irmão e à irmã, sua esposa. Que o bebê de vocês nasça livre para adorar a Jeová, os Deuses.

    Força, irmão querido

    Apóstolo TDS

    English Translation via Google Translate:

    “I’m happy with my work on the internet being limited to English-speaking countries and not to the country that I live in if this is the price I have to pay to take care of my family.”

    I want his brother to know that we, here in Brazil, we are very supportive of the suffering that his brother is going right now. It is also a triumph which his brother is living, for those who wanted humiliated humiliating. Jehovah, who does not disfellowship people who have ‘more noble-minded “to bolster the brother and sister, his wife. The baby is born you free to worship Jehovah, the Gods.

    Strength, dear brother

  • January 1, 2014 at 6:42 am
    Permalink

    Great job John!
    If somebody has yet had doubts about the governing body rules, your conversation with the elders should dissolve them all.
    Our families – you explained it very clear that they cannot tear them out from us without repercussions. We all should do the same.

  • January 1, 2014 at 7:02 am
    Permalink

    I wish the best for you and your wife in your new found freedom, and hope that 2014 gives you much peace of mind.

  • January 1, 2014 at 7:35 am
    Permalink

    I loved how the elders were so determined to follow “procedures”, not from the Bible (no where to be seen in the Bible in fact) but WATCHTOWER procedure when it came to your wife’s letter. They are the modern day Pharisees. Be glad you are not amongst those cold hearted wolves in sheep’s clothing – all nice and smiley faced until they see that they can no longer use you and deceive you with their lies. Congratulations! You and wife have just escaped a cult!!

  • January 1, 2014 at 8:12 am
    Permalink

    Congratulations and all the best to you and your family!!!

  • January 1, 2014 at 9:21 am
    Permalink

    Hello Cedres. you’re a modern figure of Antigone (Sophocle). Obedience to the divine and universal laws, facing the laws of human society and politics. Loyalty to domestic law and conscience, independent of circumstances, farm dignity in the face of oppression.

  • January 1, 2014 at 10:04 am
    Permalink

    “I, [my real name], am no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses – nor do I have or seek any affiliation with the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.”

    Your wife’s statement seemed very clear to me. It appears to be a statement designed to exactly reverse her answer of ‘yes’ to the question:

    “Do you understand that your dedication and baptism identify you as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses in association with God’s spirit directed organization?”

    I think it is rather arrogant and presumptuous of them to refuse to accept the sentiments in her letter. Doesn’t she have the right to terminate membership of an organization in her own words? Only an organization that thinks too much of itself and considers its members as its slaves or property, would demand that members can only leave on its terms and not without negative repercussions.

  • January 1, 2014 at 10:27 am
    Permalink

    Hi John, its funny I had convinced myself you lived in UK where I live, I guess that is the beauty of the internet we can feel close to someone even though they may be hundreds of miles away. You certainly did well, and it is totally shocking that they would not discuss doctrine at the meeting. I wander what the average JW would think of that.
    It was totally ridiculous of them to try and have their own meeting with your wife when you made it so obvious how she felt and even offered to phone her for clarification.
    It is sad to leave former friends. I have been through that and it is horrible, but like me you could no longer live a lie.
    I totally share your feelings of trying to help others realize the dangers of becoming mixed up in this religion.
    Please continue your efforts, as I know you must be helping many, just like I and many other ex JWs do on various web sites.
    All the best to you.

  • January 1, 2014 at 11:06 am
    Permalink

    I don’t know why you even bothered to attend. I left the JW’s because I didn’t believe it was the “truth”. Eventually they got me for associating with a DF’d person. I refused to attend the JC because I didn’t recognise the court. Simple, effective and most of all, my self-respect intact. No hidden mikes or cameras, no regaling folk how the proceedings went. They DF’d me sure enough, but it was my choice not to give my power away to an unworthy committee. The only way to win is not to play the game.

  • January 1, 2014 at 11:11 am
    Permalink

    Well done John! Video and written report is great. Also love Victor’s drawing – wow!

    I have for a few years at New Year said – whats next? I wonder what is next for you?

  • January 1, 2014 at 12:04 pm
    Permalink

    I admire how calm and composed you were. I would probably be ranting and raving like a lunatic. Your experience reminded me of something I read recently, “Rage only results from discontent when restlessness is unfocused or its longings remain unfulfilled. When channeled wisely and fueled by hopeful vision for the future, discontent can be the beginning of genuine social transformation by inspiring courageous action.” –Christianity After Religion, by Diana Butler Bass

  • January 1, 2014 at 12:18 pm
    Permalink

    Hugs from Ukraine, John!
    My best wishes to you and your family.
    The only thing I can say ’bout those hellders: “Forgive’em for they do not know what they are doing.”
    And the “help” they offer is just their usual word game.
    The trickiest thing they were trying to play was an attempt to bring division between you and your wife. But you’ve escaped it OK.
    And 99,9% they lied about how they came to know about your website.

  • January 1, 2014 at 12:32 pm
    Permalink

    John:
    My support, respect and comfort, all go out to you. I went through a similar “trial experience” and while the words spoken were slightly different, the spirit and direction the proceedings took were just about the same. When it comes to an “apostasy” issue the outcome for anyone who has the fortitude to stand up for real truth is predetermined, Its not about truth or even about scripture, its about loyalty to an organization and the men who run it. The Bible is secondary to that and God is also secondary to their concept of “self sovereignty” placing the organization above all else. The reality is that God and his word are used to promote the organization and its leadership when exactly the opposite is what God wants.

    There must be hundreds if not thousands of “apostasy stories” out there, similar to our own. I wonder if somehow we could find a way to gather them into one volume and let everyone who is interested in knowing see what goes on in these secret “trials”

    John ben Wilhelm

  • January 1, 2014 at 1:48 pm
    Permalink

    Its always amazing how the elders claim that all they want to do is help, but they cant discuss doctrine with you ar even answer biblical questions. It really shows how shallow elders are anymore. They are told what to do and how to think by the Watchtower, but they cant reason from the Bible. Now they will spend years trying to reason from the Bible with someone else that has apostasized from another religion and try to get them to be a Witness, but they have no time to reason with you and all of your spiritual questions.

    What they dont stop and think about is that it takes JW’s approximately 6 to 12 thousand hours of field service time to produce one baptised witness. Now you figure all of that time used for one person and they end the meeting instantly when you say you have a letter to give them.
    They have no loyalty to Gods sheep at all. Thay are only loyal to the Watchtower and that’s all.

    The Watchtower needs weak minded “yes men” to carry out their commands. You can ask any question as many times as you want while you are studying the Bible with JW’s, but as soon as your baptised, you no longer have ANY rights to ask questions again and if you do, you better end up with the same answer as them or your instantly labeled as a potential apostate.

    May the God of humble people and honest hearts bless you for exposing wrong doing and injustice from the Watchtower and from the 8 men who have given themselves unquestionable power and authority over ones who think they are on the path of life, but who are swayed by dishonest men. Hang in there man.

    They will have their day in court one day to.

  • January 1, 2014 at 2:29 pm
    Permalink

    Good for you John. I say bring it. At every convention I’ve ever been to, there was a line of angry religious men from various neighboring churches with signs carrying exaggerated claims against the JWs. Oh my did we all pride ourselves on walking past them peacefully and making them look bad. My husband and I thought.. Lets make a different type of lineup.. Disfellowshipped and shunned family members and children. Just there trying to get them to say hello to us. Then lets see how proud they are to walk right past and ignore their sons, daughters, grandchildren .

  • January 1, 2014 at 3:19 pm
    Permalink

    We didn’t have the privilege of a committee meeting, they just disfellowshipped us unknown to us, and now 30 years later our daughter, her husband, two granddaughters and an inlaw have cut us out of their life. The organization/elders will not give us any details about when they booted us.
    We lost those members of our family, plus 45 others. Is this Christian?

  • January 1, 2014 at 3:39 pm
    Permalink

    Wow. I felt like I was reading a suspenseful novel or something. I have come to your blog often, but have never known your full story. I can’t tell you how eye-opening this is for people to read. You’re free from them. They’ll never be able to take that away. Good for you.

  • January 1, 2014 at 4:19 pm
    Permalink

    The Watchtower is brilliantly locking people into their control by taking men and giving them POWER over their congregation members. They feel like they are authoritative and that gives them something they never had. And, they think is is from God. Whats the difference from Catholics that confess before a priest? Judicial Committee or Priest, whats the difference?

  • January 1, 2014 at 4:21 pm
    Permalink

    Too much authority and not enough experience with it to judge others.

  • January 1, 2014 at 5:11 pm
    Permalink

    I’m sure we would be interested in your feelings a few months afterwards…I too have to make the journey you made…I’m technically still-in but faded but only for family reasons…but the time is approaching where I want to and need to exit properly…

    But enjoy…you are truly free.

    • January 1, 2014 at 5:45 pm
      Permalink

      I remember the night I finally said Thats Enough, I will never go to another meeting, and 38 years later I have never been back.My 2 brothers and I suffered from Watchtower fear tactics when we were 5 years old until about 25 and understand how they manipulate their subjects with Fear of demons and Armageddon. I cannot count how many times my eyes were to “rot out” because I hated the meetings as a child. Our mother is still in the organization some 56 years and still under complete mind control. She wants to know why my brothers and I hate the Watchtower all these years later. I told her that if an adult would have been so wonderful to us as a child 95%of the time and violently abused us 5% of the time, which do you think has the deepest effect on our childhood memories. The JW torture we endured was similar. I no longer believe in freedom of religion. No religion has a right to abuse children with fear.

  • January 1, 2014 at 7:30 pm
    Permalink

    You and your family’s story is so moving. My heart sank when I read it, but at the same time it is so encouraging to think about the fact that so many family’s all over the world are going through the same situation. It was so odd to see this artical after I just had a three hour discussion on disfellowshiping with someone I really care about. I have been out for over three years, and though I have not been officially disfellowshiped, I have delt with the same kinds of crazy reasonings, and have lost all of my friendss who are JWs. It’s really hard and so emotionally draining. At times it feels as if it would be more productive to have a conversation with a rock then to try reasoning with someone who has been part of the watchtower organization. Even though I’m not sure how things will be for me in the future, I feel so much more peaceful inside knowing that I’m not going through a routine i know is wrong in order to not suffer the consequences of leaving. I think you and your family will feel that peace to because you have stood up for how you really feel and living a genuine life full of love. Even if your family and old friends have cut you off for the time being, deep down I thing they must have a great deal of respect for the strength that you and your wife have shown. It may inspire others to also have the strength to live in freedom. As Desmond Tutu said, “an ocian is just made up of drops of water”. One instance of standing up for yourself may seem insignificant in the face of this monstrous organization, but Rosa parks simply siting at the front of the bus bought in the flood waters. I’m convinced that change will come. Where I live, already I know several people who have left, and more that wolf like to leave but are afraid. I will try to think of ways we can all work together to restore freedom and family ties, a website in Spanish may be a good idea?? Do you need funding for your website? Could you set up a place on your website where donations can be accepted? Also an area where we could share ideas on how to be proactive locally would be great. The best to you and your family, and a very happy new year!

  • January 1, 2014 at 10:17 pm
    Permalink

    typical JW judicial committee! no surprise at-all! they never consider scriptures in a judicial meeting…its always about watchtower policy,watchtower policy and watchtower policy! nothing more!

  • January 1, 2014 at 11:31 pm
    Permalink

    Cedars, don’t lose hope. I’m willing to bet that the
    Watchtower will “refine” their view on shunning soon.
    There is a huge campaign all over the world against this
    horrible unscriptural practice that could affect their stand($$$$$)
    with governmental laws on human rights.

    Your baby will have her grandparents to love and cherish, and you will have your Dad back; it is apparent how much you love him. Just remember how strong brainwashing can be. A person is not a person anymore, they become a mere
    tool in the hand of their tormentors.

    I honestly I admire you, I envy your integrity and your courage. What wonderful parents you will be!

  • January 2, 2014 at 1:08 am
    Permalink

    Terry, it is totally different. Have you had anything like “Judicial Committee” among Catholics? No!! Why “Judicial Committees” not “Confession Committees”? My wife and I appeared before those “courts” in March 2008! She was the first to be “INTERROGATED” by 3 men and it took something like 3 hours! When they called me in, … one of the 3 elders told me “Your wife told us that you…”! No, I cannot say it here! My wife was emotionally killed, torn in pieces and what I expected as help turned to be a hell, now elders manipulated her as she was taken captive by What she had told them… We were finally torn apart each other…

    Totally DIFFERENT!!

    • January 2, 2014 at 4:16 am
      Permalink

      You are right. I meant to say in theory it is the same for forgiveness. The JW’s MUST go to the committee first for the forgiveness process to begin. Their conscience will never allow them to be forgiven by God if first they don’t confess their sin(s) to the committee. The committee meetings are nothing more than Watchtower interrogations. I know how they work. Thanks for your comment.

Comments are closed.